Wishful Thinking about the Future: Does Desire Impact Optimism?

نویسندگان

  • Zlatan Krizan
  • Paul D. Windschitl
چکیده

The notion that desire for an outcome inflates optimism about that outcome has been dubbed the desirability bias or wishful thinking. In this paper, we discuss the importance of distinguishing wishful thinking from the more general concept of motivated reasoning, and we explain why documenting overoptimism or correlations between preferences and optimism is not sufficient to infer a desirability bias. Then, we discuss results from a review and meta-analysis of the experimental literature on wishful thinking. These findings, in conjunction with more recent work, not only highlight important moderators and mediators of the desirability bias but also point out limitations of the empirical research on the bias. These results also reveal an important difference between how likelihood judgments and discrete outcome predictions respond to desirability of outcomes. We conclude by presenting avenues for future research useful for understanding wishful thinking’s manifestation in everyday environments and its integration with related phenomena. —A soon-to-be bride and groom who hope the weather will cooperate on their wedding day. —An Illinois grade-schooler who thinks it would be ‘pretty cool’ if Chicago was indeed selected as the host city for the 2016 Olympics. —An office worker who, with a Duke Blue Devils victory, could win the distinction and money for having the best set of NCAA Tournament predictions. —A Democrat from Texas hoping the news from the swing states does not disappoint. Will the fact that these people strongly desire a particular outcome inflate their optimism about that outcome? The notion that such desires have a causal impact on optimism has been dubbed the desirability bias and is sometimes referred to as wishful thinking. To most people, wishful thinking might be a truism. George Orwell (1945) wrote that ‘people can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes’, and perusal of New York Times archives over the last few years revealed many uses of the term, from apparent wishful whims about topics from sports

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Measuring Wishful Thinking: the Development and Validation of a New Scale

Title of Document: MEASURING WISHFUL THINKING: THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW SCALE Angela H. Eichelberger, Ph.D., 2007 Directed by: Professor Harold Sigall, Department of Psychology This dissertation describes the development and validation of a 10-item scale measuring individual differences in wishful thinking, or the degree to which individuals’ desires bias their judgments. A study...

متن کامل

The influence of outcome desirability on optimism.

People are often presumed to be vulnerable to a desirability bias, namely, a tendency to be overoptimistic about a future outcome as a result of their preferences or desires for that outcome. In this article, this form of wishful thinking is distinguished from the more general concepts of motivated reasoning and overoptimism, and the evidence for this bias is reviewed. The authors argue that de...

متن کامل

Wishful Thinking in Strategic Environments

Towards developing a theory of systematic biases about strategies, I analyze strategic implications of a particular bias: wishful thinking about the strategies. Considering canonical state spaces for strategic uncertainty, I identify a player as a wishful thinker at a state if she hopes to enjoy the highest payoff that is consistent with her information about the others’ strategies at that stat...

متن کامل

So good it has to be true: Wishful thinking in theory of mind

5 In standard decision theory, rational agents are objective, keeping their beliefs independent from their 6 desires. Such agents are the basis for current computational models of Theory of Mind (ToM), but the 7 accuracy of these models are unknown. Do people really think that others do not let their desires color 8 their beliefs? In two experiments we test whether people think that others enga...

متن کامل

CEP Discussion Paper No 1047 March 2011 ( updated December 2011 ) Priors and Desires

This paper offers a simple but powerful model of wishful thinking, cognitive dissonance, and related biases. Choices maximize subjective expected utility, but beliefs depend on the decision maker's interests as well as on relevant information. Simplifying assumptions yield a representation in which the payoff in an event affects beliefs as if it were part of the evidence about its likelihood. A...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009